Showing posts with label patent troll. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patent troll. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Understanding Oracle America v Google: The patents at issue
I want to credit Groklaw with pointing out this useful post by Carlo Daffara which has links to the specific patents under which Oracle America has filed their lawsuit. The article itself is an interesting read beyond just the usefulness of the links. One byproduct of my research on this issue has been familiarizing myself with Carlo Daffara's work. He's a major player in the support of free software in the EU, and does work on open source business models. Here's a link to info on Mr. Daffara.
Labels:
Android,
Carlo Daffara,
free software,
Google,
Oracle,
Oracle v Google,
patent troll
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Oracle v Google -- getting started
Before I begin to summarize what might actually be going on in the Oracle v Google lawsuit, it might be a good idea to aggregate some of the information already on the web to give readers a chance to draw their own preliminary conclusions. The links I'm posting are the sources of information I've found so far, and I've tried to edit them down to reduce the redundancy and provide a good starting point for really figuring out what's going on.
The most important document for understanding the case (although if you're not a lawyer it may not be the first thing you'll want to read) is the complaint itself, which was filed in the United States District Court -- Northern District of California.
The law firms representing Oracle in the case are Morrison and Foerster LLP, and Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Here is a link to Oracle's press release on the suit.
... and a link to a TechCrunch article quoting a response Google sent via email.
For basic info the the following articles are representative of what the press is carrying at the moment:
Epic smackdown looms in Google vs Oracle from CNNMoney.com
Lawsuit may signal era of Oracle, Google tensions from the Economic Times (India)
Oracle sues Google over Android from Mashable
Here's an interesting blog from Taylor Buley at Forbes, which raises a question I had pondered. Why didn't Oracle file the suit in the Eastern District of Texas, which is a patent troll's paradise? I'll have to mull over Buley's reasoning, but the reasons behind the chosen venue is a good point to ponder.
Groklaw, which has long been the best (though most partisan) site for following the various SCO lawsuits will be following Oracle v Google in depth.
Finally, here is Richard Stallman's call to arms Fighting Software Patents. It doesn't have any direct bearing on Oracle's chances of success, but it's a nice little manifesto to review when an important software patent case arises.
The most important document for understanding the case (although if you're not a lawyer it may not be the first thing you'll want to read) is the complaint itself, which was filed in the United States District Court -- Northern District of California.
The law firms representing Oracle in the case are Morrison and Foerster LLP, and Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Here is a link to Oracle's press release on the suit.
... and a link to a TechCrunch article quoting a response Google sent via email.
For basic info the the following articles are representative of what the press is carrying at the moment:
Epic smackdown looms in Google vs Oracle from CNNMoney.com
Lawsuit may signal era of Oracle, Google tensions from the Economic Times (India)
Oracle sues Google over Android from Mashable
Here's an interesting blog from Taylor Buley at Forbes, which raises a question I had pondered. Why didn't Oracle file the suit in the Eastern District of Texas, which is a patent troll's paradise? I'll have to mull over Buley's reasoning, but the reasons behind the chosen venue is a good point to ponder.
Groklaw, which has long been the best (though most partisan) site for following the various SCO lawsuits will be following Oracle v Google in depth.
Finally, here is Richard Stallman's call to arms Fighting Software Patents. It doesn't have any direct bearing on Oracle's chances of success, but it's a nice little manifesto to review when an important software patent case arises.
Labels:
Android,
Google,
java,
Oracle,
Oracle v Google,
patent troll,
patents,
software patents
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)